AGENDA AND MINUTES
Fun photos:
1. Updates:
- RS,
VJB: Conference will be July 12 - 15, 2022. VJB's recording will used.
- PT: Submitted to TS. Awaiting authorization from the coauthors to proceed.
- MH:
Currently summarizing studies on technology progress. There is a need to focus. Finished a section on semi-endogenous growth theory.
- HA:
- Figure numbers were too small. PT fixed the problem.
- How to prevent version branching and merge problems.
- Google docs
- Github
- Checking out/in (signing out/in, taking possession of/returning) the file from the email thread
- Do updated S-curve figure in early 2023 with 2022 data and submit short to thespacereview.com?
- DB: No updates. 11th Southeast Symposium on Contemporary Engineering Topics (SSCET) will be on Friday, September 16th in Little Rock, in the UALR EIT building. DB will list everyone as co-presenters.
- Lunar calendar for 2022. This is a new potential hiccup in developing a Moore's law for deep space vessel lifetimes.
- CAPSTONE, a 12-unit CubeSat, lunar orbiter with 9-month planned lifetime, launched this week after delays. Lost communication, but it was noted that the launch vehicle Lunar Photon may substitute: https://spacenews.com/capstone-suffers-communications-problem. But comm reestablished a day or two later, delaying the next phase of the mission a little but not a serious problem.
- Artemis 1 mission (uses expendable launch vehicle; to launch "no earlier than" Aug.
- Payload: Orion capsule with no crew, will not be reused, and short lifetime of 25 days ending in reentry and recovery
- Contents: instruments, etc.
- Payloads: Multiple CubeSats including JAXA's OMOTENASHI
- CLPS-1 (Peregrine Mission One), launching in Q4 2022
- Payload: Peregrine lander with short lifetime
- Contents: rovers, instruments, etc. with longer lifetimes
- CLPS-2 (IM-1) (Intuitive Machines 1), launching Dec. 22
- Payload: Nova-C lander (lifetime: 1 lunar day)
- Contents: instruments, rover, CubeSat camera
- DOGE 1 (CubeSat)
- Lunar Flashlight (CubeSat)
- Luna 25, launching Sept. (doubtful?) by Russia
- Smart Lander for Investigating Moon (SLIM), JAXA vessel launching in 2022, short lifetime of 2-3 weeks in orbit and several days after landing
2. Reading and discussion
- In depth reading: "A Forgotten Moment in Physiology: the Lovelace Woman in Space Program (1960-1962)", 2009, ...\femaleAstronauts\relatedArticles\WomenInSpaceRef3.pdf. Vote was 4.
- We read up to near the end of p. 160 where a new paragraph starts, so we can start there next time.
- Possible readings/videos that have not yet been scanned and voted on. Read/view paragraph/minute or two of each and vote: Should we read it in more depth? 5=strongly agree, 4=agree, 3=neutral, 2=disagree, 1=strongly disagree.
- https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/07/we-need-new-science-progress/594946
- https://www.planet4589.org. Scan one link deep from the astronautics page at https://planet4589.org/space/index.html. Don't read large documents through entirely.
- One of McDowell's *yearly* (not the more frequent news) reports, in particular, the most recent one: https://planet4589.org/space/papers/space20.pdf.
- Goldin et al., The Productivity Paradox, 2019.
- https://noahpinion.substack.com/p/techno-optimism-for-2022
- James Pethokoukis, https://fasterplease.substack.com/, tech foresight blog by former Jeopardy! champ.
- Chad Jones, https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/, writes about endogenous growth theory.
- Pantelis Koutroumpis, The Productivity Paradox, a report.
- Some interesting videos are at the Kartik Gada channel such as at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuRX67CJhaOT98Jdjh85CEQ which we discussed previously.
- Future Spaceflight Meditations, a cosmist perspective, by Jiulio Prisco, physicist formerly with the ESA.
- Readings that we previously scanned and voted on that might or might not be read in more depth at some point. Listed in decreasing order of vote score.
- Already voted on: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Let's find out more about it. We skimmed https://www.picmet.org/main/ and the question next is whether we want to read through the site in more detail. Do we search this site for another paper/papers to read? Vote was 3 11/12.
- Already voted on. We found that the paper at https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-40896-1_3 seems like it might be a good paper for us to read. Vote was 3.9.
- Already voted on: One candidate: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/394111 is a recent account of using DEA (which is part of TFDEA). We rechecked the abstract and read the first paragraph. Votes were: 3,5,2,5,4, averaging 3.8.
- 5/20/22: We read the enlarged font paragraph at the beginning of "Women's Place in Space Exploration, 1996, ...\femaleAstronauts\relatedArticles\WomenPlaceInSpaceExplorationRef2.pdf. Vote was 3 1/3.
- Already voted on: The Institute for Progress. They address questions like what policies and social factors affect technological progress. We will try out a bit of https://progress.institute/immigration-powers-american-progress/ to see if we want to read it in full. Vote was 3 2/7.
- Voted on 4/15/22: One of McDowell's update reports, available on the website. Link is: https://planet4589.org/space/jsr/jsr.html. We checked #804. Vote was 3 1/12.
- For general reference here are some generic questions about articles (and videos):
- What is the source?
- What is the most significant advance in the human knowledge presented in the paper?
- Why is that advance important?
- What important questions arise from the paper for future research?
- What important questions would it be nice if the paper answered, but does not answer?
- What does the paper present that is novel (no one else has provided that before)?
- What is the relevance of the paper to our satellite research goals?
- Questions from the group?
