1/28/22: Reading, with updates also

     AGENDA AND MINUTES

1. Updates:
  • VJB research. Updating a draft for Feb. 24 deadline. Sent a partial draft today.
  • PT research. Expect to finish SLR in a couple of weeks.
  • News. Burned out rocket will crash into the Moon. 
  • Women in space project. 
  • Students needing projects?
2. Reading and discussion:
  • de Alcantara and Martens 2019. We finished up to the 4th paragraph in Section 5, so we will start there next time and maybe finish the paper.
  • Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Let's find out more about it.
  • A background paper related to the women in space project: see SpaceTravelMetric-b6-5-16\PapersAndPresentations\femaleAstronauts\relatedArticles 
  • One of McDowell's yearly reports, available on the website.
  • https://noahpinion.substack.com/p/techno-optimism-for-2022
  • Future possibility: https://ourworldindata.org/technological-progress; Goldin et al., The Productivity Paradox, 2019.
  • James Pethokoukis, https://fasterplease.substack.com/, tech foresight blog by former Jeopardy! champ; Chad Jones, https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/, writes about endogenous growth theory.
  • We found that the paper at https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-40896-1_3 seems like a good paper for us to read.
  • MH suggests a short book called Future Spaceflight Meditations, a cosmist perspective, by Jiulio Prisco, physicist formerly with the ESA.
  • MH suggests Pantelis Koutroumpis, The Productivity Paradox, a report.
  • Some interesting videos are at the Kartik Gada channel such as at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuRX67CJhaOT98Jdjh85CEQ which we discussed previously.
  • For general reference here are some generic questions about articles (and videos):
    • What is the source?
    • What is the most significant advance in the human knowledge presented in the paper?
    • Why is that advance important?
    • What important questions arise from the paper for future research?
    • What important questions would it be nice if the paper answered, but does not answer?
    • What does the paper present that is novel (no one else has provided that before)?
    • What is the relevance of the paper to our satellite research goals?
    • Questions from the group?

No comments:

1/21/22: Updates and reading

    AGENDA AND MINUTES

1. Updates:
  • Congratulations to MH on his acceptance to UIUC!
  • Women in space project. SD updated the graphs to show 1/10s of a % so now they add up to 100%. Any comments on what HA sent out please let him now. VJB had a suggestion for the intro, adding a tech-wide percentage. 
  • VJB research. Updating a draft for Feb. 24 deadline.
  • PT research. Later.
  • Students needing projects?
2. Reading and discussion:
  • de Alcantara and Martens 2019. We finished up to the 2nd full par. on p. 134 (on cluster 2), so we will start there next time.
  • A background paper related to the women in space project: see SpaceTravelMetric-b6-5-16\PapersAndPresentations\femaleAstronauts\relatedArticles 
  • One of McDowell's yearly reports, available on the website.
  • https://noahpinion.substack.com/p/techno-optimism-for-2022
  • Future possibility: https://ourworldindata.org/technological-progress; Goldin et al., The Productivity Paradox, 2019.
  • James Pethokoukis, https://fasterplease.substack.com/, tech foresight blog by former Jeopardy! champ; Chad Jones, https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/, writes about endogenous growth theory.
  • We found that the paper at https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-40896-1_3 seems like a good paper for us to read.
  • MH suggests a short book called Future Spaceflight Meditations, a cosmist perspective, by Jiulio Prisco, physicist formerly with the ESA.
  • MH suggests Pantelis Koutroumpis, The Productivity Paradox, a report.
  • Some interesting videos are at the Kartik Gada channel such as at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuRX67CJhaOT98Jdjh85CEQ which we discussed previously.
  • For general reference here are some generic questions about articles (and videos):
    • What is the source?
    • What is the most significant advance in the human knowledge presented in the paper?
    • Why is that advance important?
    • What important questions arise from the paper for future research?
    • What important questions would it be nice if the paper answered, but does not answer?
    • What does the paper present that is novel (no one else has provided that before)?
    • What is the relevance of the paper to our satellite research goals?
    • Questions from the group?
No comments:

1/14/22: updates and reading

   AGENDA AND MINUTES

1. Updates:
  • Women in space project. Latest update needed is to go with 3-digit percentages, since 87.5% and 12.5% both round up and then add up to 101%.
  • VJB research. Sent an update. Exponential decay eq. needs to be somewhere in the paper.
  • PT research. Working on review article.
  • Students needing projects? 
2. Reading and discussion:
  • de Alcantara and Martens 2019. We finished up to the first par. on p. 133, so we will start there next time.
  • A background paper related to the women in space project: see SpaceTravelMetric-b6-5-16\PapersAndPresentations\femaleAstronauts\relatedArticles 
  • One of McDowell's yearly reports, available on the website.
  • https://noahpinion.substack.com/p/techno-optimism-for-2022
  • Future possibility: https://ourworldindata.org/technological-progress; Goldin et al., The Productivity Paradox, 2019.
  • James Pethokoukis, https://fasterplease.substack.com/, tech foresight blog by former Jeopardy! champ; Chad Jones, https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/, writes about endogenous growth theory.
  • We found that the paper at https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-40896-1_3 seems like a good paper for us to read.
  • MH suggests a short book called Future Spaceflight Meditations, a cosmist perspective, by Jiulio Prisco, physicist formerly with the ESA.
  • MH suggests Pantelis Koutroumpis, The Productivity Paradox, a report.
  • Some interesting videos are at the Kartik Gada channel such as at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuRX67CJhaOT98Jdjh85CEQ which we discussed previously.
  • For general reference here are some generic questions about articles (and videos):
    • What is the source?
    • What is the most significant advance in the human knowledge presented in the paper?
    • Why is that advance important?
    • What important questions arise from the paper for future research?
    • What important questions would it be nice if the paper answered, but does not answer?
    • What does the paper present that is novel (no one else has provided that before)?
    • What is the relevance of the paper to our satellite research goals?
    • Questions from the group?
No comments:

1/7/22: Statuses & Readings

  AGENDA AND MINUTES

1. Updates:
  • MH paper. It's published! 
  • Women in space project. HA updated the document and shared it in Google Docs. SD will update the histogram to show percentages instead of raw numbers. 
  • VJB research. Has drafted two sections of the half-life article. He will share these imminently.
  • PT research. Continuing on the same path.
  • Financials: settled.
  • Any students at one of our universities wanting a project that involves automatic checks on the planet4589 data files, or making graphs of them, would be welcome. It is a useful type of project and students should find these to be accessible, doable projects that future students can redo to provide updated graphs that also provide checks on the earlier graphs.
2. Reading and discussion:
  • MH found this interesting graph: https://mobile.twitter.com/ns_whit/status/1471581216210145291. We discussed it.
  • de Alcantara and Martens 2019. We finished up to the last full paragraph on p. 132 (on Lichtenthaler), so we will start there next time.
  • A background paper related to the women in space project. See SpaceTravelMetric-b6-5-16\PapersAndPresentations\femaleAstronauts\relatedArticles 
  • One of McDowell's yearly reports, available on the website.
  • https://noahpinion.substack.com/p/techno-optimism-for-2022
  • Future possibility: https://ourworldindata.org/technological-progress; Goldin et al., The Productivity Paradox, 2019.
  • James Pethokoukis, https://fasterplease.substack.com/, tech foresight blog by former Jeopardy! champ; Chad Jones, https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/, writes about endogenous growth theory.
  • We found that the paper at https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-40896-1_3 seems like a good paper for us to read.
  • MH suggests a short book called Future Spaceflight Meditations, a cosmist perspective, by Jiulio Prisco, physicist formerly with the ESA.
  • MH suggests Pantelis Koutroumpis, The Productivity Paradox, a report.
  • Some interesting videos are at the Kartik Gada channel such as at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuRX67CJhaOT98Jdjh85CEQ which we discussed previously.
  • For general reference here are some generic questions about articles (and videos):
    • What is the source?
    • What is the most significant advance in the human knowledge presented in the paper?
    • Why is that advance important?
    • What important questions arise from the paper for future research?
    • What important questions would it be nice if the paper answered, but does not answer?
    • What does the paper present that is novel (no one else has provided that before)?
    • What is the relevance of the paper to our satellite research goals?
    • Questions from the group?

No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

5/17/24: Status update on AM & TE papers

   The Human Race Into Space Requires Kidneys, and Other Important Topics              A research and discussion group              Ag...