The human race into space will require kidneys: 7/22/22: Updates; finish reading "A forgotten moment in physiology: ..."

AGENDA AND MINUTES

Fun photo:

Roswell, NM

1. Updates:

RS, VJB: In a couple months they will decide about journal publication. MH is willing to do a review if requested, as needed for the journal version.
PT: SLR was submitted to Int. J. of Innov. and Tech. Mgmt.
MH: Lit. Rev. - looking at physical proximity and its effects on innovation. This relates to a paper by Basnet a few years ago. Could tell us more about it next time.
HA:

Checking out/in (signing out/in, taking possession of/returning) the file from the email thread. There should be a single standard thread.

Do updated S-curve figure in early 2023 with 2022 data and submit short to thespacereview.com?

DB: No updates. 11th Southeast Symposium on Contemporary Engineering Topics (SSCET) will be on Friday, September 16th in Little Rock, in the UALR EIT building. DB will list everyone as co-presenters.
Lunar calendar for 2022. This is a new potential hiccup in developing a Moore's law for deep space vessel lifetimes. No news this week?

Launched: CAPSTONE, a 12-unit CubeSat, lunar orbiter with 9-month planned lifetime, launched after delays. Launch vehicle Lunar Photon may also be a separate independent deep space vessel.
Future: Artemis 1 mission (uses expendable launch vehicle; ~~to launch "no earlier than" Aug.~~ "as of July 2022, Artemis 1 is expected to be launched between 29 August and 6 September." - Wikipedia.

Payload: Orion capsule with no crew, will not be reused, and short lifetime of 25 days ending in reentry and recovery

Future: Luna 25, launching Sept. (doubtful?) by Russia
Future: Smart Lander for Investigating Moon (SLIM), JAXA vessel launching in 2022, short lifetime of 2-3 weeks in orbit and several days after landing

2. Reading and discussion

Finished reading Ryan et al., "A Forgotten Moment in Physiology: the Lovelace Woman in Space Program (1960-1962)", 2009.
Possible readings/videos that have not yet been scanned and voted on. As time allows, read/view paragraph/minute or two of each and vote: Should we read it in more depth? 5=strongly agree, 4=agree, 3=neutral, 2=disagree, 1=strongly disagree.

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/07/we-need-new-science-progress/594946
https://www.planet4589.org. Scan one link deep from the astronautics page at https://planet4589.org/space/index.html. Don't read large documents through entirely.
One of McDowell's *yearly* (not the more frequent news) reports, in particular, the most recent one: https://planet4589.org/space/papers/space20.pdf.
Goldin et al., The Productivity Paradox, 2019.
https://noahpinion.substack.com/p/techno-optimism-for-2022
James Pethokoukis, https://fasterplease.substack.com/, tech foresight blog by former Jeopardy! champ.
Chad Jones, https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/, writes about endogenous growth theory.
Pantelis Koutroumpis, The Productivity Paradox, a report.
Some interesting videos are at the Kartik Gada channel such as at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuRX67CJhaOT98Jdjh85CEQ which we discussed previously.
Future Spaceflight Meditations, a cosmist perspective, by Jiulio Prisco, physicist formerly with the ESA.

Readings that we previously scanned and voted on that might or might not be read in more depth at some point. Listed in decreasing order of vote score.

Already voted on: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Let's find out more about it. We skimmed https://www.picmet.org/main/ and the question next is whether we want to read through the site in more detail. Do we search this site for another paper/papers to read? Vote was 3 11/12.
Already voted on. We found that the paper at https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-40896-1_3 seems like it might be a good paper for us to read. Vote was 3.9.
Already voted on: One candidate: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/394111 is a recent account of using DEA (which is part of TFDEA). We rechecked the abstract and read the first paragraph. Votes were: 3,5,2,5,4, averaging 3.8.
5/20/22: We read the enlarged font paragraph at the beginning of "Women's Place in Space Exploration, 1996, ...\femaleAstronauts\relatedArticles\WomenPlaceInSpaceExplorationRef2.pdf. Vote was 3 1/3.
Already voted on: The Institute for Progress. They address questions like what policies and social factors affect technological progress. We will try out a bit of https://progress.institute/immigration-powers-american-progress/ to see if we want to read it in full. Vote was 3 2/7.
Voted on 4/15/22: One of McDowell's update reports, available on the website. Link is: https://planet4589.org/space/jsr/jsr.html. We checked #804. Vote was 3 1/12.

Ryan et al., "A Forgotten Moment in Physiology: the Lovelace Woman in Space Program (1960-1962)", 2009. Completed 7/22/22.
Various previous papers.

For general reference here are some generic questions about articles (and videos):

What is the source?
What is the most significant advance in the human knowledge presented in the paper?
Why is that advance important?
What important questions arise from the paper for future research?
What important questions would it be nice if the paper answered, but does not answer?
What does the paper present that is novel (no one else has provided that before)?
What is the relevance of the paper to our satellite research goals?
Questions from the group?

The human race into space will require kidneys